The Break – The Black Struggles

In this episode KC, Chris, John, Darius, Leisha, and Rasaan discuss the many struggles that we as blacks experience, including who can and cannot publicly speak on it, the language we use, our leadership, and infrastructure.

Poem: We To America by James Weldon Johnson

Please leave your comments and feedback below, or you can contact us via:


Facebook: Black Is Magazine


Hotline: (323) 455-4219

Find us on Stitcher & iTunes!

The Reverend Fred Luter, Jr.

As the black community overwhelmingly celebrates the re-election of our first black President, I’ve been surprised to note how few of us are aware of another groundbreaking rise to higher office achieved by one of our own. This office is pastoral, not political, yet the social implications of this occurrence are perhaps no less significant than that of President Obama’s election to the office of President of the United States. I’m talking about the Reverend Fred Luter, Jr. and his own election as president of the Southern Baptist Convention.

The Southern Baptist Convention, (S.B.C.), for those who don’t know, is the largest body of Baptists in the entire world. It is the second largest Christian body in the United States with 16 million members, second only to the Catholic Church. Given that most American Christians are Protestant, you could argue that Fred Luter, Jr., a 56-year old black man from New Orleans, stands as the most powerful religious figure in America. This is a significant fact in its own right. But it’s all the more amazing when you consider the history of the Southern Baptist Convention.

The S.B.C. has an old and venerable history in the United States, and particularly in the south. But to say that the S.B.C. has a questionable history with respect to race would be putting it mildly. It became the Southern Baptist Convention in the first place in 1845, having split with the northern Baptists because it refused to prohibit slave holding churches from sending out missionaries. Though the Baptist community even in the south had a history of racial tolerance and acceptance towards blacks throughout the 1700’s (even allowing blacks to be preachers in the south and opposing slavery), the southern Baptists gradually changed their attitude towards slavery as their membership expanded among the elite, wealthy planter class of the Southern Gentry. (Perhaps ironically, conversions of blacks in the south increased significantly as well during this time, especially among the slaves. Black Baptists formed their own organizations after the Civil War, most notably the National Baptist Association.) From that time onward, and even after the Civil War, the attitudes of Southern Baptists with regards to civil rights closely tracked that of white Southerners generally. Conservative Southern Baptists would support Jim Crow laws (though there was a moderate faction that favored desegregation) and were generally not allies of the Civil Rights Movement.

All this of course makes the election of Fred Luter, Jr. to the presidency of the S.B.C. (he was elected unopposed by the delegates at the convention; itself a first in S.B.C. history) all the more striking. A jovial yet fiery personality behind the pulpit, the senior minister of the Franklin Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans Reverend Luter was born the third of five children and raised by his divorced mother who made ends meet as a seamstress and as a surgical scrub assistant. He turned to God at the age of 21 after a motorcycle accident nearly killed him, leaving him with a head injury and a compound fracture. He began as a street preacher and ultimately found his way to Franklin Avenue in 1983, ultimately leading the growth of the church to 7,000 people prior to Hurricane Katrina in 2005; after which Reverend Luter was noted for his leadership in rebuilding the congregation following unparalleled devastation left in the Hurricane’s wake, rebuilding a crushed and demoralized congregation back up to a membership of 5,000 as of his election to the presidency of S.B.C in June of last year. He finishes his one year term in June of this year.

If it is a testament to the degree to which minds and hearts have changed over the many generations of this country’s racial history unto now that Revered Luter could be elected President of a body of primarily white Christians with roots deep in slavery and segregation, it is also perhaps a testament to the power of the Christian message of love and forgiveness, even when articulated across the boundaries and tensions of the color-line. Reverend Luter recalled having been invited to preach at a Baptist church in Crowley, Louisiana, in the early ’90’s (the first time he preached outside of New Orleans). It was a strictly white congregation, and the pastor who invited Reverend Luter to speak had become nervous about how his congregants would react to a black preacher.

“Just don’t put my picture up,” Luter instructed him, preferring to leave it a surprise. Indeed his audience was silent and tense when Fred Luter astonished them with his presence. But then he spoke of the grace and the goodness of God in the warm, approachable manner for which he is known. Their attitudes changed even that night. One woman from the crowd would approach Reverend Luter afterwards, admitting to him that she had begun by feeling angry that a black man was preaching at her church…and ended by thanking God he came.

In Memoriam: Jerome Allen

When Black Is first originated in 2007, it was a tiny operation that was held together by myself and a friend, Nneka Hall. At the time, we did what we could to create a monthly e-publication and leaned on our loved ones to assist us. Nneka’s partner, Jerome Allen, was one of those loved ones, and most recently we lost him in a fatal car crash. In his memory, I am reposting the first article he wrote for Black Is. I recall him sending several revisions; he wanted to ensure it was a perfect first piece, which for me was a testament to his character. Jerome, you will be greatly missed.

The long standing relationship between blacks and whites in America has been a tumultuous one mired by the events of colonial slavery (16th – 19th century) and 20th century Jim Crow. But as we approach the end of the 1st decade of the 2nd millennium, most figure we are beyond such racist and malicious acts. I say think again. A multitude of cases have sprung renewed life into the racial tension that exist between the two, most notably the unjust prosecution of the young men of Jena Louisiana. While other events range from the widespread hanging of nooses around the country to the marking of a swastika on the body of a deaf black student, racism has reminded us that it is going nowhere anytime soon. With emotions rising high, we must work to find a resolution or become participants (willing or unwilling) in a repeat of racial uprising.

The array of incidents involving blacks and whites has invoked the spirits of the past, which was prevalent at the march in Jena last month. As one news report stated, ‘it was a page out the fifties and sixties…’ The reason why this statement is more than just an analogy is because we are still those people from the fifties and sixties. Both blacks and whites. We carry the genes of our ancestors, therefore they are always with and within us. So when we are faced with similar actions of the fifties and sixties, this reveals the associated emotions that are consistent with our treatment. But when we take to the streets, we are labeled as bitter and angry, rather than the justice seekers we are. We are told to get over the past, but my response to that would be to ask a rape victim if their rapist raped them repeatedly, then returned year after year to commit the same act, would they get over it.

We need to go no further than the internet to find out how people of opposing sides view the latest affairs between the rival races. While the majority of the backlash has been directed towards blacks, it calls into question whether whites actions are perceived as innocent and justified. One site in particular seems to think so: As we witness the behavior exemplified by these types of people, we must ask, “Where do we go from here?” What do we do to avoid a repeat of the sixties?

As it is apparent that these problems have and still do exist, the only solution is one which is rooted in the repair of the relationship. I contend that there are three keys to the success of this quest. First, a willingness on both sides to sit down and discuss the issues. Second, open admission to the contribution to the detriment of the relationship. Third, a concrete agenda aimed at ridding the country of this ailment now as well as in the future.

The main problem has been that we have yet to make it to the first step in the process. Blacks have argued that whites won’t answer the call, while whites suggest an informal apology is a suitable settlement. While both sides will justify their position, what remains is a lack of bonafide communication. And without proper communication, no relationship can survive. The origin of the problem must be examined, otherwise problematic situations will be doomed to repeat themselves. And if that’s the case, our best bet is to be prepared to go to war.