Salvation: For Christians Only? (Part One of Three)

We live in a majority Christian nation (83 percent of Americans, according to a recent ABC News poll, identify themselves as Christian) and studies show that African-Americans constitute the most religiously adherent subgroup of America’s very large Christian majority. As such religious and perhaps more particularly theological issues carry great importance in our Christian community generally and the African-American Christian community in particular. There is no shortage of controversial topics of discussion relating to Christian beliefs, what the Bible really says and what it actually means. But the most important, I would argue, is the question regarding that which constitutes salvation and, specifically, whether or not non-Christians can be saved. Because in a very real way, the way in which a Christian answers this question indicates the vast trend of all the rest of her or his spiritual and theological thinking.

My firm opinion is that non-Christians can, and often are, saved. It is a controversial point of view within the church but one that I imagine a significant portion of worshipers white, black and otherwise in this country yet share, whether minority or majority however I’m not sure. Socially conservative evangelical Christians however are among all other Christian groups least likely to believe that salvation is available to those who do not accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and savior and these represent the single largest group of Christian believers in this country, whether white or black, so the view that non-Christians cannot be saved should probably be regarded as, both historically and contemporaneously, the dominant view. It’s entrenched, supposed obviousness gives it quite a convincing advantage in religious debates on the subject, and while I’m always heartened to hear the likes of professor Cornell West and professor/minister Michael Eric Dyson (both of whom I have precious little in common with politically but whose personal philosophies I find much to admire in) opine on this matter in the direction of God’s limitless love and forgiveness for all his righteous children, I’m often a little embarrassed by the inability of proponents of this point of view to deliver a sound theological argument for it’s merits, rather than retreating to extra-biblical platitudes which can be of very limited persuasiveness to those who are more religiously conservative and those who are rooted in the technical substance of the Word. (I squirmed to watch popular and fashionable pastor Rob Bell, author of the book Love Wins, being interrogated like a guilty child by MSNBC’s Martin Bashir for seeking to manipulate the Bible into being  “palatable,” to a modern audience, never managing to give a solid scriptural response for his position.) The truth is however that it is the traditional point of view regarding the accessibility of salvation that is so clearly weak from a scriptural perspective. It is time for those of us who take the word of God seriously to explain why.

I could call upon many passages in the Bible to support the idea that salvation goes to all righteous people, and I will, but in truth I only need call upon one verse to make this clear for in fact it is stated quite explicitly. For Paul writes to his junior in ministry, Timothy, the following saying “For to this end we both labor and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe.” (1rst Timothy 4:10). Now Paul says quite clearly that God is the savior of all men, especially those who believe, in saying so he is quite clearly not saying that God is exclusively the savior of all men who believe, for that would render his words non-nonsensical. I do think there is some context to be taken into account here, inasmuch as I do not believe that Paul means to suggest that un-Godly people are saved by God. (I do feel strongly that there is a Hell to which evil people go for eternity, thus disqualifying me really as a liberal theologian.) But it is clear that God can be and often is the savior of non-believers. Of course, those who believe otherwise who are aware of this blatant statement hidden in the many under-perused passages of scripture will argue, as a friend of mine did to me once, that what Paul meant was that God had prepared salvation for all in the same way a person might prepare a meal for many, but that just as many who were invited might not show up for that meal, so will many not believe in the Christ who has offered them salvation. A worthy attempt at a rationalization, I think, but woefully unconvincing simply because the analogy so misunderstands the statement. Paul does not say that God has prepared to save all but has not, in the way that a mother might prepare to feed all her children but is unable to. Paul says that God has and will save all, as a parent who has and will feed all his or her children. There is no other way to interpret this without betraying what it is the Word says.

But this is just the first step in unwrapping the paper tiger that is the unbiblical, mostly conservative Christian belief in Christian-only salvation. For if Paul means what he says, then we still have to consider what it is Jesus means when He says “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” (John 14:6) and others like it. The true meaning of this verse reveals the true spiritual message of Christianity that we will expound upon in the second and third segments of this series, one which stands in such stark opposition to Christianity in it’s typical, religiously oriented conception.

The spiritual root of the scriptural message is contained in the oft-cited words of the apostle John, who wrote: “Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. He who does not love does not know God, for God is love.” (1rst John 4:7, 8). Notice that John says that everybody who loves is born of God, making no distinction between believer and non-believer. But the more relevant point in these words for our purposes are in the simple phrase “God is love.” Those of you who have a decent command of the scriptures probably recall Jesus informing the disciples that “God is Spirit.” God is not a man like deity in the clouds, but an omnipotent spiritual force and the essence and nature of that force, John reveals, is love. The Holy Spirit therefore, the Spirit of God, is itself the Spirit of love. Only in understanding this can we truly begin to understand the Bible…

The Battle Within: Spirituality vs. Religion

I often find myself questioning why people do what they do, or why how people all of sudden turn over a new leaf, yet still display the old leaves from time to time. I understand that we are human, born with sin, and learning about who we are everyday.

I get up everyday and feel empowered by my God and I feel as though my spirit is lifted closer to him. What I don’t feel everyday is the religious connection.  I go to church, for the words of guidance from the pastor, but don’t feel a connection to the members or an obligation to the church. And it’s not like I’m holding back or not opening myself up, but I also don’t want to feel as though I’m forcing myself, it should be free willing in my opinion.

I saw a bumper sticker once that read, “Religion is for people afraid of going to Hell, Spirituality is for people who have already been there.” In a weird way it made sense to me(it also made me laugh). I read a few definitions on spirituality and religion, and put together what I think they mean:

Spirituality can refer to an ultimate reality or transcendent dimension of the world as you view it. An inner path enabling a person to discover the essence of his or her being, or the “deepest values and meanings by which people live.”  A concern for that which is unseen and intangible, as opposed to physical or mundane. Free from the body, clear of thought. To have an appreciation for religious values that include sacred matters or religion or the church.

Religion is the belief in, and worship of a higher controlling power, like a personal God or gods. It’s a particular system of faith and worship in which details of belief is taught or discussed in a pursuit of understanding, or interest to which someone ascribes supreme importance. It allows people to govern themselves by a moral code of human conduct while trying to give purpose and understanding to the universe. As a  member of a religious order, a person is bound by its vows and guidelines.

The two things that stand out in spirituality and religion is “free” and “bound” A person can be free spirited, but also bound by religion, “Let go and let God”,but be constraint to the word and religion. Religion should not bound your spiritual life. I understand that religion and spirituality do conjure up differences. But at the same time they are just terms and words. Spirituality and religion can be interchangeable. The boundary between religion and spirituality is fluid.

We are ever evolving as human beings. There’s always a new challenge, or circumstance, or interest which can and will determine how we see ourselves and how try to get in tuned with our spirit through religion. I’m trying to find that balance with my spirit and religion. Maybe for me, that balance isn’t a 50-50 split by it’s true sense of the term. For me, it might be 60-40 or 70-30, I don’t know. All I can agree on is that I’m not there yet. The battle continues.